PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
home page
current numbers
archival numbers
list of articles:
list przewodni/covering letter
editor
Scientific Committee
publisher
subscription
advertising
important links

Results of operative treatment of BPH ? contemporary methods of evaluation and an attempt of applying in our patients.
Article published in Urologia Polska 1996/49/1.

authors

Piotr Dobroński, Andrzej Borkowski
Z Katedry i Kliniki Urologii Akademii Medycznej w Warszawie.
Kierownik Kliniki: Prof. drhab. n. med. Andrzej Borkowski.

keywords

prostate benign prostatic hyperplasia operative treatment results

summary

The paper presents the rules of evaluation of BPH operative treatment results'
recomended by International Consultatian on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
patronized by WHO Prospective evaluation of 103 patients with BPH treated opera-
tively (by open or transurethral adenomectomy) in our department in one year was
performed according to these recomendations. The analysis was based upon evalua-
tion of the following parameters: International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS),
Quality of Life Index (QOL), peakuroflow (Qmax), prostate size (V) and, additio-
nally, postvoid residual urine ? pre and 3 months postoperatively. Groups with and
without complete urine retention were compared as well as results of open and trans-
urethral adenomectomies.

references

  1. ? 1. Barry M.J., FowlerF.J., Jr.,0'Leary M.P., Bruskewitz R.C, Holłgrerwe H.L., Mebust
  2. W.K., Cockett A.T.K and The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Asso-
  3. ciation: The American Urological Associacion Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hy-
  4. perplasia. J. Urol., 1992, 148, 1549-1557.
  5. ? 2. Barry M.J., Fowler F.J., Jr., 0 'Leary MP, Bruskewitz R. C .Holtgrerwe H.L., Mebust
  6. W.K. and The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Associacion: Correla-
  7. tion of the American Urological Associacion Symptom Index with self administered ver-
  8. sions of the Madsen-Iversen, Boyarsky and Maine Medical Assessement Program symp-
  9. tom indexes. J. Urol., 1992,148, 1558-1563.
  10. ? 3. Boyarsky S., Jones G., Paulson D.F., Prout G.R.Jr. A new look at the bladder neck
  11. obstruction by the Food and Drug Administration regulators: guidelines for investigation
  12. of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Trans. Amer. Ass. Genito-Urin. Surg., 1977, 68:29
  13. ? 4. BruskewitzR. C, hersen P, Madsen P.O.: Value of postvoid residual urine determi-
  14. nation in evaluation of prostatism. Urology, 1982, XX, 6; 602-604.
  15. ? 5. Cronbach L.J.,: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,
  16. 1951, 16: 297-334. ? 6. Fowler F.J.Jr., Wenneberg J.E., Timothy R.P, Barry M.J., Mul-
  17. ley A. G.Jr., Hanley D.: Symptom status and ±uality of life following prostatectomy. J. Am.
  18. med. Ass., 1988; 259, 20; 3018-3022.
  19. ? 7. Fowler F.J. Jr., Barry M.: Quality of life assessement for evaluating benign prostatic
  20. hyperplasia treatments. Eur. Urol., 1993, 24 (suppl.), 24-27.
  21. ? 8. Jorgensen J.B., Jensen K.M.E., Mogensen P.\ Significance of predominatly irrita-
  22. tive symptomatology before a prostatic operation. J. Urol., 1990. 143. 39
  23. ? 9. Madsen P.O., hiersen P.\ A point system for selecting operarive candidates. Benign
  24. Prostatic Hypertophy. Red. Hinnman F.Jr., Springer Verlag, New Yocfc. 19S3. "63-65.
  25. ? 10. Roehborn CG:. Objective and Subjective Response Criteria to Diagnose Benign
  26. Prostatic Hyperplasia. Eur. Urol., 1993; 24 (suppl 1):2.
  27. ? 11. SommerR; Nielsen K.K., Bauer T:. Voiding patterns in men evałuaced by question-
  28. naire survey. Br. J. Urol., 1990, 65, 155.
  29. ? 12. The Second International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hypcrpłasia (BPH),
  30. Paris - June 27-30, 1993 - Proceedings 2.