PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

Answer to dr hab. Jacek Ogrodnik comments on the article: CT in patients suspectedof urolithiasus. Urol. Pol., 2000, 53, 380- 389
Article published in Urologia Polska 2001/54/2.

authors

A. Cieszanowski, Katarzyna Zaniewicz, Barbara Rożniatowska-Sadkowska, Tomasz Nadolski, Jan Skarbek-Kiełczewski, Jan Szymanowski

references

  1. [1]Andersen R.. Wegner M.E.H.: Intravenous urography revisited in the age of ultrasound and computerized tomography: Diagnostic: yield in cases of renal colic, suspected pelvic and abdominal malignancies, suspected renal mass and acute pyelonephritis Urol. Int. 1997.58.221-226.
  2. [2] Bove P., Kaplan D., Dalrymple N. et al.: Reexamining the value of hematuria testing in patients with acute flank pain. .1. Urol. 1999. i62. 685-687.
  3. [3] Dalrymple N.C.. Verga M., Anderson K.R. ct a!.: The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management ofacuteflank pain. J.Urol. 1998, 159,735-740.
  4. [4] Dorio P.J.. Pozniak M.A.. Lee FT Jr., Kuhlman J.E.: Non-con-trasl-enhancetl helical computed tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. Wisc.MedJ. 1999. 98. 30-34.
  5. [5] Fielding J.R.. Steele G-, Fox L.A. el al.: Spiral computerized tomography I the evaluation of acute flank pain. A replacement for excretory urography. J.Urol. 1997. 157, 2071-2073.
  6. [6] Greenwell T.J.. Woodhaks S.. Demon E.R.M. et al: One year\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s clinical experience with unenhanced spiral computed tomographyfor the assessment of acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic. BJU 1m. 2000. 85. 632-636.
  7. [7] Cirisi G.. Stacul F., Cuttin R. el al.: Cost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain. Fur. Radiol. 2000, 10. 1620-1627.
  8. [8] Miller O.F., Kane C.J.: Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Curr.Opin.Urol. 2000. 10. 123-129.
  9. d S.R. cl al.: Prospective com-mpitted tomography and intra-n of acute flank pain. Urology
  10. [9] Miller O.F.. Rinccr S.K.. Reicha parison of uuenlianccd spiral a venous urogram ill the evuluatit 1998.52.982-987.
  11. [10] Mostafavi MR., Ernst R.D.. Sallzman B.: Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J. Urol. 1998. 159, 673-675.
  12. [11] Nachmann M.M.. I larkaway R.C.. Summerton ei al.: Helical CT scanning: The primary imaging modality for acute flank pain. AmJ.Emerg.Med. 2000, 18. 649-652.
  13. [12] Niall O.. Russell J., McGregor R. el al.: A comparison of non-contrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessmentq] acute flank pain. J.Urol. 1999. 162. 1707-1708.
  14. [13] Palel M.. Han ¦.S.Y.. Vaux K. el al.: A protocol of early spiral computed tomography for the detection of stones inpatients with renal colic has reduced the time of diagnosis and overal management cost. Alisl.Ncw.ZealandJ.Surg. 2000.70, 39-42.
  15. [14] Sheley R.C., Semonscn K.G.. Quinn S.I-\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'.: Helical CT in the evaluation of renal colic. Am.J.Emerg.Vled. 1999, 17. 279-282.
  16. [15] Smilli R.C.. Rosenficld AT.. Choe K.A. el al.: Acute flank pain: comparison of non-conlruslenhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiol. 1995. 194. 789-794.
  17. [16] Vicweg .1., The C. Freed K. cl al.: Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J.Urol. 1998. 160- 679-684.