PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

Augmentation ureterocystoplasty in children with neurogenic bladder
Article published in Urologia Polska 2002/55/1.

authors

Lidia Skobejko-Włodarska, Jerzy Czyż, Krystyna Strulak, Piotr Gastoł, Czesław Szymkiewicz, Małgorzata Baka-Ostrowska, Jan Karol Wolski, Mieczysław Śmigielski
Klinika Urologii Dziecięcej Instytutu „Pomnika - Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka\" w Warszawie Kierownik kliniki: dr hab. Małgorzata Baka-Ostrowska

keywords

bladddcr, neurogenic bladder dysfunction, non-function kidney, urctcrocystoplasty

summary

Objective. To present long-term outcomes of augmentation ureterocystoplasty.
Patients and methods. Since 1995 to 1999 augmentation ureterocystoplasty was performed in 11 children with non-functioning kidney with megaureter and neurogenic bladder dysfunction following meningocoele repair. 7 patients did not benefited from earlier intermittent catheterisation and anticholinergic therapy. Mean patient age 7,3 years (range 1-17). Eight children required ventriculo-peritoneal shunt because of hydrocephalus. Megaureter was produced by severe vesicoureteral reflux and by vesicoureteral junction stenosis in 9 and 2 individuals, respectively. Single cases of cross renal ectopia of non-functioning kidney or duplex kidney with non-functioning lower pole or renal insufficiency were observed. The urodynamic study proceeding ureterocystoplasty in all children revealed small bladder capacity and high intravesical pressure, which were caused by low compliance bladder in 7 children or by detrusor hyperactivity in 2 children or both in 2 children.
During ureterocystoplasty nephrectomy was performed. Both ureters were used for augmentation in one patient with renal insufficiency to prepare bladder for future renal transplant. MACE procedure (Malone Antegrade Continence Enema) was performed in one patient. In another the appendix was long enough, to be divided and used for MACE procedure and for the Mitrofanoff stoma.
Results. Patients follow up ranged from one to five years. In urodynamic study bladder capacity increased and intravesical pressure decreased in 9 and 10 patients, respectively
Conclusions. Ureterocystoplasty is a treatment regimen for selected patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and non-functioning kidney with megaureter. Retroperitoneal surgical procedure is important in children with renal insufficiency, because the intraabdominal cavity is preserved for future peritoneal dialysis and in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Augmentation ureterocystoplasty facilitates bladder preparation for kidney transplant in children with renal insufficiency.

references

  1. 1. Adams MC: Ureterocystoplasty with an intact distal ureter. Dialogues in Ped Urol 1998: 21; 4-5.
  2. 2. Aiibadi HA, Wolpert JW, Reinberg Y: Augmentation wetroey-stoplasty utilizing nonfunctioning moiety of a duplex system. Dialogues in Ped Urol 1998; 21; 5-6.
  3. 3. Bellinger M: Ureterocystoplasty: A unique method for vesical augmentation in children. J Urol 1993; 149; 811-815.
  4. 4. Churchill B, Aiibadi H, Landau E: Ureteral bladder augmentation. J Urol 1993; 150; 16-19
  5. 5. Due! BP, Gonzales R, Barthold JS: Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoptasty. J Urol 1998; 159; 998-1001.
  6. 6. Hitchcock R, Dully P, Malone P: Ureterocystoplasty: The „bladder\\\" augmentation of choice. Br J Urol, 1994; 73; 575-578.
  7. 7. Ikeguchi EF, Stifclman MD, Hcnsle TW: A prospective comparison of ureteral tissue expansion and bladder augmentation versus ileal augmentation. J Urol 1998; 159; 78-81.
  8. 8. Landau E, Jayanthi V, Khoury A: Bladder augmentation: ureterocystoplasty versus ileocystoplasty. J Urol 1994; 152; 716-719.
  9. 9. Pugach JL, McLorie GA, Khoury AE: Ureterocystoplasty: ove-iview and swgical technique. Dialogues in Ped Urol 1998; 21; 2-4.
  10. 10. Reinberg Y, Allen RJ, Vaughn M, McKenna P: Nephrectomy combined with lower abdominal extraperitoneal ureteral bladder augmentation in the treatment of children with the vesicoureteral reflux dysplasia syndrome. J Urol 1995; 153; 177-181.
  11. 11. Wolf J, Turzan C: Augmentation ureterocystoplasty. J Urol 1993; 149; 1095-1099.
  12. 12. McDougal WS: Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 1992; 147; 1199-1202.
  13. 13. Cendron MS: Long-term follow-up after ureterocystoplasty in a small cohort of patients. Dialogues in Ped Urol 1998; 21; 7.
  14. 14. Landau EH: Cystometric properties of the bladder augmented with ureter. Dialogues in Ped. Urol 1998; 21; 6.
  15. 15. Kim C, Gosalbez RJ, Burke GR: Simultaneous ureterocystoplasty and living related renal transplantation. Clin Transplan 1996; 10-13
  16. 16. Landau E, Jayanthi V, McLorie G: Renal transplantation in children following augmentation ureterocystoplasty. Urol 1997; 50; 260-264.
  17. 17. Churchill B, Jayanthi V, Landau E: Ureterocystoplasty: Importance of the proximal blood supply. J Urol 1995; 154; 197-201.
  18. 18. Atala A, Cilento BG: Ureteral dilatation end expansion for ureterocystoplasty. Dialogues in Ped. Urol 1998; 21; 7-8.
  19. 19. Lailas N, Cilento B, Atala A: Progressive ureteral dilatation for subsequent ureterocystoplasty. J Urol 1996; 156; 1151-1154.

correspondence

Lidia Skobejko-Wlodtirskti
ul. Kossakowskiego 37A
04-744 Warszawa
tel./fax (0-22) 815 62 67