authors
-
Kazimierz Krajka, Arkadiusz Mikszewicz, Lech Stachurski, Dariusz Perkowski
- Z Katedry i Kliniki Urologii Akademii Medycznej w Gdańsku
Kierownik: Prof. dr hab. med. K. Krajka
summary
- Urine diversion method after radical resection of the bladder because of cancer has been
- presented. Rectal bladder walls are formed by upper part of rectum, distal sigmoideum and
- detubularized part of 40 cm long of ileum. Ureters have been connected with a proximal part of
- intestinum by Wallace I with formation of valve mechanism.
- 8 patients with infiltrating urinary bladder cancer have been operated. No major
- post-operative complications have been observed. Follow-up was 5-22 months long. 3 patients
- died because of the progress of the desease.
- Other patients are well. They defecated 5-6 times a day, feeling no need to remove the
- bowels at night. Control examinations carried on for 3-6 months after the operation revealed
- improved kidney activity and narrowing of ureters. Except one case no contrast in the ileal graft
- and ureters during x-ray examination has been noticed.
- Recent results of the method have been considered incouraging.
references
- I.Borkowski A.: Rozwój aktualnych koncepcji na temat definitywnego odprowadzenia moczu. Urol. Pol., 1990, 43, 137. —
- 2. Crissey MM., Steale G.D., Gittes R.: Carcinoma in colonic urinary diversion in rats. Surg. Form., 1979, 30, 554. —
- 3. Mc Dougal W.S.: Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J. Urol. 1992,147,1190. —
- 4. Fisch M., Wammack R., Miller S.D., Hohenfellner R.: The Mainz Pouch (Sigmo-rectum pouch). J. Urol., 1993,149,258.
- 5. Ghoneim M.A., Ashamallah A.K., Mahran M.R., Kock N.G.: Further experience with the modified rectal bladder (the augmented and valved rectum) for urine diversion. J. Urol., 1992, 147, 1252. —
- 6. Gittes R.F.: Carcinogenesis in ureterosigmoidostomy. Urol. Clin. N. Amer., 1986, 13, 201. —
- 7. Harzmann R.F., Weckermann D.\\\\ Cancer induction caused by urinary diversion using intestine. J. Urol., 1989, 141,4, 2, 304 A. —
- 8. Hautmann R.: Harnableitung —1989. Urologia, 1989,28,177. —
- 9. Hautmann R.E.: A view of continent urinary diversion today Symposium. Cont. Urol., 1992,4, 12. —
- 10. Kamidono S., OdaJ,, Hamami E., Hakosaka K., Kataoka N., Ishigami I.: Urinary diversion anastomosis of the ureters into a sigmoidpouch and end-to-side sigmoidorectostomy. J. Urol., 1985, 133, 391.
- II. Knox A.J.S., Jago R.H.: The value of intestinal valves in urinary diversion: an experimental study. Brit. J. Urol., 1975, 47, 319. —
- 12. Kock N.G., Ghoneim M.A., Lycke G., Mahran M.R.:Urinary diversion to the augmented and valved rectum, preliminary results with a novel surgical procedure. J. Urol., 1988, 140, 1375. —
- 13. Leadbetter G.W.,Zickerman W.F.P., Pierce E.: Ureterosigmoidostomy and carcinoma of the colon. J. Urol., 1979, 121, 732
- 14. Modelski W.: The transplantation of the ureters into the partially excluded rectum. J.Urol 1962, 87, 122. —
- 15. Miller K.3 Hautmann R.: Urodynamic evaluation of the functional rectal bladder:An experimental study. J.Urol., 1989, 141, 4, 2, 351 A. —
- 16. Pansadero V.,Cappa M.:Ureterosigmoidostomy technics and results: follow-up and review 36 cases of ureterosigmoidostomy. New trends in urology. Abstract Book Nijmegen, 1989. —
- 17. Shands C., Mc Dougal W.S., Wright E.P.: Presentation of cancer at the urothelial enteric anastomotic site J.Urol., 1989, 141, 178. —
- 18. Skinner D.N., Lieskowsky G., Skinner D.C., Boyd S.D.: Urinary diversion. Current Problems of Surgery, 1987, 24, 7, 431. —
- 19. Sokołowski J., Lorenz J Stolarczyk J., Górecki M., Dembowski J., Zdrojowy R.\\\\ 15-letnie własne doświadczenia w wytwarzaniu pęcherza odbytniczego sposobem Manclaire\\\'a. Urol. Pol., 1992, Suppl. str. 63
- 20. Starting IR., Veckling D.T., Golchrist K.W.: Value of colonoscopy after ureterosigmoidostomy. Surgery, 1989, 96, 784
correspondence
prof. dr hab. med. Kazimierz Krajka
80-742 Gdańsk, ul. Prof. Kieturakisa 1
|