wersja polska printable version
	kwartalnik ISSN 0500-7208 Czasopismo punktowane przez KBN, Index Copernicus oraz w bazie GBL

1. Bostwick DG, Srigley J, Grignon D et al: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: morphologic criteria for its distinction from well-differentiated carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1993; 24(8);819-832
2. Oluwole F, Wang S, Mariappan R: Practice Patterns of Clinicians Following Isolated Diagnoses of Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation on Prostate Biopsy Specimens. Archiv Pathol and Lab Med 2004, 5, 557-560.
3. Iczkowski KA, Bassler TJ, Schwob VS et l: Diagnosis of “suspicious for malignancy” in prostate biopsies: predictive value for cancer. Urology 1998, 51, 749-758.
4. Iczkowski KA, Bostwick DG: Criteria for biopsy diagnosis of minimal volume prostatic adenocarcinoma: analytic comparison with nondiagnostic but suspicious atypical small acinar proliferation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000, 124, 98-107.
5. Epstein JI: How should atypical prostate needle biopsies be reported? Controversies regarding the term ASAP. Hum Pathol 1999, 30, 1401- 1402.
6. Reyes AO, Humphrey PA: Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1998, 109, 416-422.
7. Murphy WM: ASAP is a bad idea. Atypical small acinar proliferation. Hum Pathol 1999, 30, 601.
8. Mancuso PA, Chabert Ch, Chin P et al: Prostate cancer detection in men with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. BJU International 2007, 99 (1), 49-52.
9. Brausi M, Castagnetti G, Dotti A et al: Immediate radical prostatectomy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. Over treatment? J Urol 2004, 172, 906-909.

dr n. med. Stanisław Wroński
Oddział Urologii Szpitala Wojewódzkiego im. dr. J. Biziela
ul. Ujejskiego 75
85-168 Bydgoszcz
wrona@ozzl.org.pl