PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
list of articles:

RESULTS OF TREATMENT OF RENAL CARCINOMA
Article published in Urologia Polska 1985/38/2.

authors

Jan Szymanowski, Zofia Kasprzycka, Jan Antczak
Z Oddziału Urologii Szpitala Bielańskiego w Warszawie Ordynator: dr n. med. J. Szymanowski

summary

In the years from 1976 to September 1984 the authors treated 94 patients for renal carcinoma, who accounted for 8.4% of patients treated for malignant tu­mours of the genitourinary organs.
Eighty-two patients were treated surgically, in 64 cases radical nephrectomy was performed connected with removal of lymph vessels and lymph nodes in the vicinity of great vesseils, and adrenals. In 9 cases a tumour plug was removed from the inferior caval vein, dn 7 cases the infiltrated wall of this vein was ex-cised, and in 2 patients the inferior caval vein was ligated ant cut.
In the postoperative period 3 patients died, and after a follow-up from 3 months to 8 years 40 patients (64.5%) are alive out of 63 patients on whom Infor­mation was available.
The authors believe radical nephrectoimy is the most advantageous and ra-tional method treatment of malignant renal tumours.

references

  1. 1. Boeminghaus F., Greipel V., Schwartmann K. P.: Analyse der Langzeiter-
  2. gabnisse nach Nephretotamie wegen Hypernephrom anhand von 442 Fallen. Urologe
  3. (A), 1982, 21, 201. ? 2. Boxer R. J., Waisman J., Lieber M. M., Mampaso M. M.,
  4. Skinner D, G.: Renal carcinoma: Computer analysis of 96 patients treated by ne­
  5. phrectomy. J. Urol., 1979, 122, 598. ? 3. Cukier J., Bronstein M., Bertoni D.: Re­
  6. sultats de la chirurgie radicale pour le cancer du rein chez L'adulte. J. d'Unol. Ne­
  7. phrol., 1978, 7?8, 515. ? 4. Delebiński B.: Wyniki operacyjnego leczenia złośliwych
  8. nowotworów nerki. Urol. Pol., 1980, 33, 2, 135. ? 5. Giuliani L., Martorana G., Gi-
  9. berti C, Pescatore D., Magnani G.: Results of radical nephrectomy with extensive
  10. lymphadenectomy for renall cell carcinoma. J. Urol., 1983, 130, 664. ? 6. Hellsten
  11. S., Berge T., Linell F.: Clinically unrecognized renal carcinoma: aspects of tu­
  12. mour morphology, lymphatica and haematogenous metastatic spraed. Brit. J. Urol.,
  13. 1983, 55, 166. ? 7. Kossakowski J. S.: Wyniki operacyjnego leczenia nowotworów
  14. nerek. Urol. Pol., 1979, 32, 1, 21. ? 8. Leńko J., Stankiewicz A.: Analiza chorych
  15. leczonych z powodu raka nerki. Pol. Przeg. Chir., 1966, 10, 77. ? 9. Patel N. P.,
  16. Lavengood R. W.: Renal cell carcinoma: natural history and results of treatment.
  17. J. Urol., 1978, 119, 72,2. ? 10. Richard F., Carvalho R., Call E., Chatelain C: Re­
  18. sultats immediats et lointains du traitment chirurgical de l'adenocaircinome renal.
  19. Annals Urol., 1981, 15, 6, 361.
  20. 11. Ritchie A. W. S., Chisholm G. D.: Manegamant of renal carcinoma ? a
  21. questionnaire survey. Brit. J. Urol., 1983, 55, 591. ? 12. Robson C. J., Churchill
  22. B. M., Anderson W.: The results of radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma. J.
  23. Urol., 1969, 101, 297. ? 13. Siminovitch J. M. P., Montie J. E., Straffon R. A.: Prog­
  24. nostic indicators in renal adenocarcinoma. J. Urol., 1983. 130, 20. ? 14. Stolar­
  25. czyk J.: Nefrektomia radykalna (doniesienie wstępne). Urol. Pol., 1980, 33, 2, 161. ?
  26. 15. Stolarczyk J., Lorenz J., Dembowski J.: 110 nefrektomii radykalnych z powo­
  27. du raka nerki. Urol. Pol., 1984, 37, 1, 61. ? 16. Swanson D. A., Borges P. M.: Com­
  28. plications of transabdominal radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol.,
  29. 1983, 129, 704. ? 17. Szymanowski J., Ejchman W., Ułanowska D.: Nefrektomia ra­
  30. dykalna w nowotworach złośliwych nerek. Urol. Pol., 1980, 33, 2, 122. ? 18. Szyma­
  31. nowski J., Kasprzycka Z.: Spostrzeżenia dotyczące wykonywania operacji radykal­
  32. nych w nowotworach złośliwych nerek. Urol. Pol., 1983, 36, 3, 241. ? 19. Waters
  33. W. B., Richie J. P.: Agresive surgical approach to renal cell carcinoma: review of
  34. 130 cases. J. Urol., 1979, 122, 306.