PTU - Polskie Towarzystwo Urologiczne
home page
current numbers
archival numbers
list of articles:
list przewodni/covering letter
editor
Scientific Committee
publisher
subscription
advertising
important links


Article published in Urologia Polska 1998/51/2.

authors

Roman Kostyrka, Stanisław Zieliński, Maciej Wójcicki
Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Transplantacyjna Instytutu Chirurgii PAM w Szczecinie
Kierownik Kliniki: prof. dr hab. S. Zieliński

keywords

kidney kidney transplantation urologic complications

references

  1. [1] Abed, J. F., Hussey, J. L.: A modification of extmvesical ureteroneocystostomy in
  2. kidney transplantation. Urology 1992,40,172.
  3. [2] Barry, J. H., Hatch, D. A.: Parallel incision, unstentedextravesical ureteroneocy-
  4. stostomy: follow-up of 203 kidney transplants. J. Urol. 1985,134,249.
  5. [3] Bishop, M. C, Sherwood, T., Evans, D. B., Caine, R. Y.: Vesico-ureteric
  6. reflux after renal transplantation. Urol. Radiol. 1980,2,109.
  7. [4] Cancarini, G., Frego, E., Simeone, C, Da Pozzo, G. R, Tosana, M., Coz-
  8. zoli, A.: Controversies concerning the treatment of ureteral complications following
  9. kidney transplantation. Arch. Ital. Urol. Nephrol. Androl. 1993,65,59.
  10. [5] Debruyne, F. M. ]., Wijdewald, P. G., Koene, R. A. P., Chafik, M.L.: Urete-
  11. roneocystostomy in renal transplantation. Is an antireflux mechanism mandatory?
  12. Br. J. Urol. 1978, 50, 378.
  13. [6] De Campos Freire, G. Jr., De Goes, G. M., De Campos Freire, J. G.: Extrave-
  14. sical ureteral implantation in kidney transplantation. Urology 1974,3,304.
  15. [7] Eschwege, P, Blanchet, R, Bellamy, }., Charpentier, B., Jardin, A., Benoit,
  16. G.: Does the use of double J ureteral stents reduce stenosis and fistulas in renal trans-
  17. plantation. Transplant. Proc. 1995, 27, 2436.
  18. [8] Finney, R. P.: Experience with new double } ureteral stent. J. Urol. 1978,120,678.
  19. [9] Gedroyc, W. M. M., Koffman, G., Saunders, A. J.: Ureteric obstruction in
  20. stented renal transplants. Br. J. Urol. 1988,62,123.
  21. [10] Gibbons, W. S., Barry, J. M., Hefty, T. R.: Complications following unstented
  22. parallel incision extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in WOO kidney transplants.
  23. J. Urol. 1992,148, 38.
  24. [11] Hatani, H., Sonoda, T.: New techni±ue ofantireflux ureteroileal anastomosis and
  25. its clinical expeńences. J. Urol. 1978,119, 735.
  26. [12] Hricko, G. M., Birtch, A. G., Bennett, A. H., Wilson, R. E.: Factors respon-
  27. sible for urinary fistula in renal transplant recipients. Ann. Surg. 1973,178, 609.
  28. [13] Jakobsen, H., Nordling, J., Munck, O., Iversen, R, Nielsen, S. L., Holm,
  29. H. H.: Sensitivity of131-1 hippuran diuresis renography and pressure flow study
  30. (Wliitaker test) in upper urinary tract obstruction. Urol. Int. 1988,43,89.
  31. [14] Jindal, R. M., Carpinito, G., Bernard, D., Schmitt, G., Idelson, B., Joshi, P,
  32. Hakaim, A., Cho, S. I.: Trial of intravesical versus extravesical ureteroneocysto-
  33. stomy in renal transplant recipients. Clin. Transplant. 1994, 8, 396.
  34. [15] Keller, H., Nóldge, G., Wilms, H., Kirste, G.: Incidence, diagnosis, and treatment
  35. of ureteric stenosis in 1298 renal transplant patients. Transplant. Int. 1994,7,253.
  36. [16] Khauli, R. B.: Modified extravesical ureteroneocystostomy and routine ureteral
  37. stenting in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1991,23,2627.
  38. [17] Kim, J. C, Banner, M. R, Ramchandani, R, Grossman, R. A., Pollack,
  39. H. M.: Balloon dilatation of ureteral strictures after renal transplantation. Radiolo-
  40. gy 1993,186, 717.
  41. [18] Kinnaert, R, Hall, M., Janssen, F., Vereerstraeten, R, Toussaint, C., Van
  42. Geertruyden, J.: Ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation: true incidence and
  43. long term follow-up after surgical correction. J. Urol. 1985,133,17.
  44. [19] Kohri, K., Yamate, T., Amasaki, N., Ishikawa, Y., Umekawa, T., Imanish,
  45. M., Katayama, Y., Kodama, M., Iguchi, M., Yachiku, S., Kurita, T.: Charac-
  46. teristics and usage of different ureteral stent catheters. Urol. Int. 1991,47,131.
  47. [20] Koo Seen Lin, L. C, Bewick, M., Koffman, C. G.: Primary use of a double
  48. J silicone ureteric stent in renal transplantation. Br. J. Urol. 1993, 72, 697.
  49. [21] Lich, R. Jr., Howerton, L. W., Davis, L. A.: Recurrent urosepsis in children.
  50. J. Urol. 1961, 86,554.
  51. [22] Lojanapiwat, B., Mital, D., Fallon, L., Koolpe, H., Raj±, R., Badosa, F.,
  52. Po, C: Management of ureteral stenosis after renal transplantation. J. Am. Coll.
  53. Surg. 1994,179, 21.
  54. [23] Mitty, H. A., Dan, S. J., Train, J. S.: Antegrade ureteral stents: technical and
  55. catheter related problems with polyethylene and polyurethane. Radiology 1987,
  56. 165, 439.
  57. [24] Morris, P.}., Chapman, J. R., Allen, R. D., Ting, A., Thompson, J. F., Dun-
  58. nill, M. S., Wood, R. F.: Cyclosporin conversion versus conventional immuno-
  59. suppression: long-term follow-up and histological evaluation. Lancet 1987,1, 586.
  60. [25] Mundy, A. R., Podesta, M. L., Bewick, M., Rudge, C. }., Ellis, F. G.: The
  61. urological complications of WOO renal transplants. Br. J. Urol. 1981, 53, 397.
  62. [26] Pleas, H. C. C, Clark, K. R., Rigg, K. M., Reddy, K. S., Forsythe, J. L. R.,
  63. Proud, G., Taylor, R. M. R.: Urologic complications after renal transplantation:
  64. a prospective randomized trial Comparing different techni±ues of ureteric anastomosis
  65. and the use of propliylactic ureteric stents. Transplant. Proc. 1995, 27,1091.
  66. [27] Politano, V. A., Leadbetter, W. F.: An operative techni±ue for the correction of
  67. yesicoureteral reflux.J. Urol. 1958, 79, 932.
  68. [28] Pollak, R., Prusak, B. F., Mozes, M. F.: Anatomic abnormalities of cadaver
  69. kidneys procured for purposes of transplantation. Am. Surg. 1986, 52,233.
  70. [29] Rees, R. W. M., Williams, J. E.: Vesico-ureteric reflux after renal transplantation.
  71. Br. J. Urol. 1972,44, 384.
  72. [30] Robson, A. ]., Caine, R. Y.: Complications of urinary drainage following renal
  73. transplantation. Br. J. Urol. 1971,43,586.
  74. [31] Shah, H. M.: Ureteral complications of renal transplant surgery. Transplant. Proc.
  75. 1995, 27, 2708.
  76. [32] Shoskes, D. A., Hanbury, D., Cranston, D., Morris, P. _[.: Urological compli-
  77. cations in 1000 consecutwe renal transplant recipients. J. Urol. 1995,153,18.
  78. [33] Starzl, T. E., Shapiro, R., Tzakis, A., Hakala, T. R.: A new techni±ue ofextravesi-
  79. cal ureteroneocystostomy for renal transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1989,21,3856.
  80. [34] Thomsen, H. S., Dorph, S., Mygind, T., Holm, FL FL: Tlie transplantedkidney.
  81. Diagnostic and interuentional radiology. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1985, 26, 353.
  82. [35] Trasher, J. B., Tempie, D. R., Spees, E. K.: Extravesical nersus Leadbetter-
  83. Politano ureteroneocystostomy: a Comparison of urological complications in 320 re-
  84. nal transplants.J. Urol. 1990^ 144,1105.
  85. [36] Yadav, R. V., Johnson, W., Morris, P. J., Sprague, P, Yoffa, D., Marshall,
  86. V. C.: Vesico-ureteric refluxfollowing renal transplantation. Br. J. Surg. 1972,59,33.